Decided

No. 20-1650

Carlos Concepcion v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

See other cases from the First Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Breyer, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito and Barrett, JJ., joined.

Argued. For petitioner: Charles L. McCloud, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioner Carlos Concepcion filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

The record from the U.S.D.C. Dist. of Massachusetts is electronic and located on Pacer, the Sealed Appendix is filed electronically.

The record from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.

Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law Scholars filed.

Brief amici curiae of The District of Columbia, et al., filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Conservative Union Foundation filed.

Brief amici curiae of Due Process Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Massachusetts, and Southern Poverty Law Center filed.

Brief amici curiae of Dr. Karen Swanson, Dr. Byron R. Johnson, and Dr. Sung Joon Jang filed.

Brief amici curiae of The Howard University School of Law Civil Rights Clinic; A New Way of Life Reentry Project filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.

Brief amici curiae of FAMM, The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the National Association of Federal Defenders filed.

Brief amici curiae of Drug Policy Alliance and The Law Enforcement Action Partnership filed.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.

ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, January 19, 2022.

Brief of petitioner Carlos Concepcion filed.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Carlos Concepcion.

Petition GRANTED.

Reply of petitioner Carlos Concepcion filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.

Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 25, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 26, 2021 to August 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 26, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 25, 2021 to July 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)

Parties

Carlos Concepcion, Petitioner, represented by Charles Luther McCloud

Carlos Concepcion, Petitioner, represented by Lisa Schiavo Blatt

United States, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Amici Curiae

American Conservative Union Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Mercer Masslon II

Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael David Pepson

Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianne Jenna Gorod

Criminal Law Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Dawinder Singh Sidhu

Dr. Karen Swanson, Dr. Byron R. Johnson, and Dr. Sung Joon Jang, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joshua Craig McDaniel

Drug Policy Alliance and The Law Enforcement Action Partnership, Amicus Curiae, represented by Vincent Gregory Levy

Due Process Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Massachusetts, and Southern Poverty Law Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Bradley N. Garcia

FAMM, The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the National Association of Federal Defenders, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew John Pincus

The District of Columbia, et al.,, Amicus Curiae, represented by Caroline Sage Van Zile

The Howard University School of Law Civil Rights Clinic; A New Way of Life Reentry Project, Amicus Curiae, represented by Tiffany Regina Wright

 
Last updated: December 8, 2022