Rehearing Disposed

No. 20-1709

David Ming Pon v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

See other cases from the Eleventh Circuit.

Docket Entries

Rehearing DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.

Petition for Rehearing filed.

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.

Reply of petitioner David Ming Pon filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 12, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 10, 2021 to October 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 10, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2021 to September 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed.

Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Professor Daniel Epps filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 11, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 12, 2021 to August 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 12, 2021)

Parties

David Ming Pon, Petitioner, represented by Steffen Nathanael Johnson

Amici Curiae

Cato Institute and Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by William McGinley Jay

Legal Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Linda T. Coberly

Professor Daniel Epps, Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel Spencer Epps

 
Last updated: December 1, 2024