Decided

No. 20-1775

Arizona, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED

Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam. Roberts, C. J., with whom Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., join, concurring.

Argued. For petitioners: Mark Brnovich, Attorney General, Phoenix, Ariz. For federal respondents: Brian H. Fletcher, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Helen H. Hong, Deputy Solicitor General, San Diego, Cal.

Letter of the Solicitor General updating on status of availability of NPRM text. (Distributed)

Reply of petitioner Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General GRANTED.

Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General.

CIRCULATED

Brief of State Respondents filed.

Brief of Federal Respondents filed.

Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara filed.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

The record from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Washington (Richland) is electronic and located on Pacer.

The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.

Brief amici curiae of Ohio, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.

Brief amicus curiae of America First Legal Foundation filed.

ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, February 23, 2022.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Arizona, et al.

Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed)

Brief of petitioners Arizona, et al. filed.

Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.

Reply of petitioners Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.

Brief of respondents Washington et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief of respondents State of California et al. in opposition filed.

Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2021, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2021 to August 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)

Parties

Arizona, et al., Petitioner, represented by Drew Curtis Ensign

Arizona, et al., Petitioner, represented by Mark Brnovich

Arizona, et al., Petitioner, represented by Brunn Wall Roysden III

City and County of San Francisco, et al., Respondent, represented by Sara Jennifer Eisenberg

federal respondents, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

State of California, Respondent, represented by Helen H. Hong

States of Washington et al., Respondent, represented by Noah Guzzo Purcell

Amici Curiae

America First Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher Ernest Mills

Immigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Lawrence J. Joseph

States of Ohio, Alaska, Kentucky, and Nebraska, Amicus Curiae, represented by Benjamin Michael Flowers

 
Last updated: December 8, 2022