Decided

No. 20-322

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. v. Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Kagan, J., joined, and in which Breyer, J., joined as to Parts II–A–2, II–B–2, and III.

Argued. For petitioners: Curtis E. Gannon, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Matthew H. Adams, Seattle, Wash.

Reply of petitioners Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Brief amici curiae of Former Immigration Judges and Board of Immigration Appeals Members filed (also in 19-896). VIDED.

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed (also in 19-896). VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.

Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed.

Brief amici curiae of Asian-Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, et al. filed (also in 19-896). VIDED.

Brief of respondents Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al. filed.

the record from the 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, January 11, 2022.

Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.

Brief of petitioners Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. filed.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.

Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 22, 2021.

Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.

Petition GRANTED. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether, under 8 U. S. C. § 1252(f)(1), the courts below had jurisdiction to grant classwide injunctive relief.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.

Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.

Brief of respondents Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al. in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; time is extended to and including December 16, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2020 to January 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2020 to December 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)

Parties

Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al., Respondent, represented by Matthew Hyrum Adams

Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al., Respondent, represented by Michael Bryan Kaufman

Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al., Respondent, represented by Ahilan T. Arulanantham

Amici Curiae

Asian-Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Nancy Morawetz

Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianne Jenna Gorod

Former Immigration Judges and Board of Immigration Appeals Members, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joseph Russell Palmore

Law Professors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Samir Ibrahim Deger-Sen

Retired Federal Judges, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joshua Adam Matz

 
Last updated: September 28, 2022