Certiorari Granted

No. 20-437

United States v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Former Executive Office of Immigration Review Judges filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of The National Immigration Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Professors Kelly Lytle Hernández, Mae Ngai, and Ingrid Eagly filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago filed.

The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.

Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.

Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Bradley N. Garcia, Esq., of Washington, D.C., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Brief of petitioner United States filed.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.

Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.

Petition GRANTED.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.

Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.

Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago in opposition filed.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)

Parties

United States, Petitioner, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Refugio Palomar-Santiago, Respondent, represented by Bradley N. Garcia

Refugio Palomar-Santiago, Respondent, represented by Jeffrey L. Fisher

Refugio Palomar-Santiago, Respondent, represented by Aarin Kevorkian

Amici Curiae

Former Executive Office of Immigration Review Judges, Amicus Curiae, represented by Richard W. Mark

Immigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher J. Hajec

National Association of Federal Defenders, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianna Fuller Mircheff

Professors Kelly Lytle Hernández, Mae Ngai, and Ingrid Eagly, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alexia D Korberg

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by David A. O'Neil

The National Immigration Project, The Immigrant Defense Project, and The National Immigrant Justice Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Tobias Samuel Loss-Eaton

 
Last updated: April 20, 2021