from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (per curiam). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting).
Reply of appellants Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees State of California, et al. (Distributed)
Motion to affirm filed by appellees City of San Jose, California, et al.
Motion For Expedited consideration of the Jurisdictional Statement and Waiver of The 14-day Waiting period for Distribution filed by appellant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
Letter of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. submitted.
Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
City of San Jose, California, et al., Appellant, represented by Richard P. Bress
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Appellant, represented by Jeffrey B. Wall
State of California, Appellant, represented by Aimee Athena Feinberg