Rehearing Disposed

No. 20-6366

James W. Riley v. Delaware

from the Supreme Court of Delaware

See other cases from Delaware.

Docket Entries

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.

Waiver of right of respondent Delaware to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)

Parties

James W. Riley, Petitioner, pro se

Delaware, Respondent, represented by Maria Teresa Knoll

 
Last updated: December 21, 2024