Denied

No. 20-951

Mary Stewart, as Administrator of the Estate of Luke O. Stewart, Sr., Deceased v. City of Euclid, Ohio, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

See other cases from the Sixth Circuit.

Docket Entries

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.

Reply of petitioner Mary Stewart, as Administrator of the Estate of Luke O. Stewart, Sr., Deceased filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent City of Euclid in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 19, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 18, 2021 to April 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Legal Scholars.

Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professor Seth Stoughton, et al.

Motion of Professor Seth Stoughton and Policing Scholars for leave to file amicus brief not accepted for filing. (February 09, 2021)

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 18, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2021 to March 18, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Justice.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 16, 2021)

Parties

Mary Stewart, as Administrator of the Estate of Luke O. Stewart, Sr., Deceased, Petitioner, represented by Easha Anand

Mary Stewart, as Administrator of the Estate of Luke O. Stewart, Sr., Deceased, Petitioner, represented by Devi Maheswari Rao

City of Euclid, Respondent, represented by Frank H. Scialdone

Amici Curiae

Institute for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Wesley Patrick Hottot

Legal Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew John Pincus

Professor Seth Stoughton and Policing Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Edward John Bennett

 
Last updated: October 9, 2024