BIO Filed

No. 21-1017

Carolyn Jewel, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Brief of respondents National Security Agency, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief of National Security Agency, et al. in opposition submitted.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 10, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 21, 2022 to May 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion of National Security Agency, et al. for an extension of time submitted.

Brief amici curiae of America’s Future, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of America’s Future, Free Speech Coalition, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed.

Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology and New America’s Open Technology Institute filed.

Amicus brief of America’s Future, Free Speech Coalition, Free Speech Defense and Education Fund, DownsizeDC.org, Downsize DC Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, Heller Foundation, California Constitutional Rights Foundation, U.S. Constitutional Rights Legal Defense Fund, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Restoring Liberty Action Committee submitted.

Amicus brief of Center for Democracy & Technology and New America’s Open Technology Institute submitted.

Amicus brief of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press submitted.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Carolyn Jewel, et al.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 21, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 18, 2022 to March 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2022)

Parties

Carolyn Jewel, et al., Petitioner, represented by Richard Roy Wiebe

National Security Agency, et al., Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Amici Curiae

Center for Democracy & Technology and New America’s Open Technology Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael David Harbour

Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Amicus Curiae, represented by Bruce David Brown

 
Last updated: May 12, 2022