Denied

No. 21-1179

Eric Lund v. Jeffrey Datzman, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.

Reply of petitioner Eric Lund filed. (Distributed)

Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.

Brief of Non-State Respondents in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 26, 2022, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 18, 2022 to May 26, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due May 18, 2022)

Letter from counsel for petitioner dated April 18, 2022 received.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.

Waiver of right of respondents County of Solano, Solano County District Attorney's Office, Krishna Abrams and Ilana Shapiro to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondents City of Vacaville, Jeffrey Datzman, et al. to respond filed.

Letter pursuant to Rule 12.6 of respondent Susannah Lund filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Susannah Lund to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2022)

Parties

Eric Lund, Petitioner, represented by Hashim M. Mooppan

California, et al., Respondent, represented by Joshua A. Klein

California, et al., Respondent, represented by Christopher D. Beatty

City of Vacaville, Jeffrey Datzman, et al., Respondent, represented by Richard W. Osman

County of Solano, Solano County District Attorney's Office, Krishna Abrams and Ilana Shapiro, Respondent, represented by Danielle Kono Lewis

County of Solano, Solano County District Attorney's Office, Krishna Abrams, Ilana Shapiro, City of Vacaville, and Jeffrey Datzman, et al., Respondent, represented by Jonathan Yates Ellis

Susannah Lund, Respondent, pro se

 
Last updated: July 3, 2022