Denied

No. 21-118

Apple Inc. v. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

See other cases from the Federal Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.

Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed.

Brief of respondents Private Respondents in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response DENIED.

Reply of Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. in support of request for an extension of time filed.

Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner Apple Inc. filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2021 to January 24, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due December 23, 2021)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.

Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 27, 2021, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 27, 2021 to October 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Brief amicus curiae of Roku, Inc. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of ACT | The App Association filed.

Brief amici curiae of Leading Innovators filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Computer and Communications Industry Association filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Jeremy C. Doerre in support of neither party filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. to respond filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 27, 2021, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 27, 2021 to September 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2021)

Parties

Apple Inc., Petitioner, represented by Catherine Mary Agnes Carroll

Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al., Respondent, represented by William McGinley Jay

Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al., Respondent, represented by H. Annita Zhong

Amici Curiae

ACT | The App Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brian Eugene Scarpelli

Computer and Communications Industry Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joshua Stephen Landau

Jeremy C. Doerre, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeremy Cooper Doerre

Leading Innovators, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark Simon Davies

Roku, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Adam G. Unikowsky

 
Last updated: November 27, 2022