Denied

No. 21-1181

Lyndsey Ballinger, et al. v. City of Oakland, California

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.

Reply of petitioners Lyndsey Ballinger, et al. filed.

Brief of respondent City of Oakland in opposition filed.

Brief amici curiae of Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc., et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.

Brief amici curiae of San Francisco Apartment Association and Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2022 to April 29, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Lyndsey Ballinger, et al.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2022)

Parties

Lyndsey Ballinger, et al., Petitioner, represented by J. David Breemer

City of Oakland, Respondent, represented by Kevin Peter McLaughlin

Amici Curiae

Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc.; Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc.; California Association of Realtors; California Rental Housing Association; Santa Barbara Apartment Association, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul J. Beard II

Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anthony Thomas Caso

San Francisco Apartment Association and Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew M. Zacks

 
Last updated: September 25, 2022