Denied

No. 21-1211

Constance George v. House of Hope Recovery, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law School Clinics GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.

Reply of petitioner Constance George filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents House of Hope Recovery and Patricia Barcroft in opposition filed.

Brief of respondents Bridges to Change, Inc. and Washington County Department of Housing Services in opposition filed.

Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law School Clinics.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 4, 2022 to May 4, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)

Parties

Constance George, Petitioner, represented by Lincoln Davis Wilson

Bridges to Change, Inc. and Washington County Department of Housing Services, Respondent, represented by Edwin A. Harnden

House of Hope Recovery and Patricia Barcroft, Respondent, represented by Shanna Ariel Lehrman

House of Hope Recovery and Patricia Barcroft, Respondent, represented by Gregory Lewis Watts

Amici Curiae

Law School Clinics, Amicus Curiae, represented by James Stephen Azadian

 
Last updated: November 21, 2024