Denied

No. 21-1243

City of Oakland, California v. Oakland Raiders, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

Reply of petitioner City of Oakland filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents Oakland Raiders, et al. in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 27, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 26, 2022 to June 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due May 26, 2022)

Brief amici curiae of Sports Economists filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Oakland Raiders, et al. to respond filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Ruth Henricks filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Open Markets Institute filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 13, 2022)

Application (21A438) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 1, 2022.

Application (21A438) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 2, 2022 to April 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

City of Oakland, Petitioner, represented by Thomas C. Goldstein

Oakland Raiders, et al., Respondent, represented by Daniel Brian Asimow

Amici Curiae

Open Markets Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew Arthur Schmidt

Ruth Henricks, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael J. Aguirre

Sports Economists, Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert E. Litan

Sports Economists, Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel John Walker

 
Last updated: December 8, 2022