Denied

No. 21-1587

Tim Shoop, Warden v. Jeronique D. Cunningham

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

See other cases from the Sixth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito and Justice Gorsuch join, dissenting from denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.

Letter of petitioner Tim Shoop received. (Distributed)

Letter of respondent Jeronique D. Cunningham received. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.

Reply of petitioner Tim Shoop, Warden filed.

Brief of respondent Jeronique D. Cunningham in opposition filed.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jeronique D. Cunningham.

Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, et al. filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 17, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2022 to August 17, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)

Parties

Tim Shoop, Petitioner, represented by Benjamin Michael Flowers

Jeronique D. Cunningham, Respondent, represented by Michael John Benza

Amici Curiae

Kentucky, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brett Robert Nolan

 
Last updated: February 6, 2023