Denied

No. 21-417

Sulzer Mixpac AG v. A&N Trading Company, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

See other cases from the Second Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.

Reply of petitioner Sulzer Mixpac AG filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents A&N Trading Company, et al. in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 7, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2022 to February 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 7, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 8, 2021 to January 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due December 8, 2021)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.

Letter of petitioner Sulzer Mixpac AG pertaining to Rule 29.6 filed.

Brief amicus curiae of the International Trademark Association filed.

Brief amici curiae of International Anticounterfeiting Coalition, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)

Parties

Sulzer Mixpac AG, Petitioner, represented by Lisa Schiavo Blatt

A&N Trading Company, et al., Respondent, represented by Jack A. Gordon

Amici Curiae

Intellectual Property Law Professors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Theodore H. Davis Jr.

International Anticounterfeiting Coalition, Industrial Designers Society of America, Inc. and Swissmem, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jamaica Potts Szeliga

The International Trademark Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jason Patrick Bloom

 
Last updated: September 24, 2022