Decided

No. 21-499

Carlos Vega v. Terence B. Tekoh

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer and Sotomayor, JJ., joined.

Argued. For petitioner: Roman Martinez, Washington, D. C.; and Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Paul L. Hoffman, Hermosa Beach, Cal.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.

Reply of petitioner Carlos Vega filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of False Confession and Wrongful Conviction Scholars filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of The National Police Accountability Project filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Historians of Criminal Procedure filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of The American Civil Liberties Union and Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of California Attorneys for Criminal Justice and Professor Charles D. Weisselberg filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Terence B. Tekoh filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer, with the exception of one Sealed document that has been electronically filed.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, April 20, 2022.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.

Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Police Organizations filed.

Brief amici curiae of Local Government Organizations (IMLA) filed.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.

Reply of petitioner Carlos Vega filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Terence B. Tekoh in opposition filed.

Response Requested. (Due December 6, 2021)

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Police Organizations filed.

Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.

Waiver of right of respondent Terence B. Tekoh to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)

Parties

Carlos Vega, Petitioner, represented by Roman Martinez V

Terence B. Tekoh, Respondent, represented by Paul Lindsey Hoffman

Amici Curiae

California Attorneys for Criminal Justice and Professor Charles D. Weisselberg, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles David Weisselberg

Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianne Jenna Gorod

False Confession and Wrongful Conviction Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Dan Stormer

Historians of Criminal Procedure, Amicus Curiae, represented by Wesley M. Oliver

Local Government Organizations (IMLA), Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles Harker Rhodes IV

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Steven Edwards Art

National Association of Police Organizations, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey Matthew Harris

State of Arizona, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Drew Curtis Ensign

The American Civil Liberties Union and Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brett Max Kaufman

The National Police Accountability Project, Amicus Curiae, represented by James Patrick Davy

 
Last updated: December 8, 2022