Decided

No. 22-105

Coinbase, Inc. v. Abraham Bielski

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Judgment issued.

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED as to respondent Abraham Bielski; the writ of certiorari as to respondents David Suski, et al. is DIMSISSED as improvidently granted. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined in full, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to Parts II, III and IV.

Argued. For petitioner: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Hassan A. Zavareei, Washington, D. C.

Response to suggestion of mootness from respondents Suski et al. filed. (Distributed)

Notice of withdrawal of his suggestion of mootness as to Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, et al, filed by respondent Abraham Bielski. (Distributed)

Reply of petitioner Coinbase, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Response to suggestion of mootness as to Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, et al., filed by petitioner Coinbase, Inc.. (Distributed)

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 21, 2023.

Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed.

Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Civil Justice Association of California filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed.

Letter of respondent Abraham Bielski regarding proceedings in the CA-9 Circuit filed. (Distributed)

Letter of petitioner Coinbase, Inc. regarding proceedings in the CA-9 Circuit filed. (Distributed)

Joint appendix Volume I & II filed. (Statement of costs filed)

Brief of petitioner Coinbase, Inc. filed.

Petition GRANTED.

Letter from petitioner received.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.

Supplemental brief of respondents David Suski, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental brief of respondent Abraham Bielski filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental brief of petitioner Coinbase, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.

Reply of petitioner Coinbase, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents David Suski, et al. in support filed.

Response Requested. (Due October 31, 2022)

Reply of Coinbase, Inc. not accepted for filing. (Corrected version to be submitted) (September 20, 2022)

Brief of respondent Abraham Bielski in opposition filed.

Waiver of right of respondents David Suski, et al. to respond filed.

Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioner DENIED.

Application (22A92) denied by the Court.

Application (22A91) denied by the Court.

Application (22A92) referred to the Court.

Application (22A91) referred to the Court.

Reply of applicant Coinbase, Inc. filed.

Letter in response to motion to expedite received from respondents David Suski, et al.

Letter in response to application (22A92) received from respondents David Suski, et al.

Response to application (22A91) from respondent Abraham Bielski filed.

Response to motion to expedite from respondent Abraham Bielski filed.

Respondents are directed to respond to the motion to expedite consideration by 5 p.m. (ET) on Monday, August 8, 2022.

Response to application (22A92) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 5 p.m. (ET) on Monday, August 8, 2022.

Response to application (22A91) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 5 p.m. (ET) on Monday, August 8, 2022.

Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner.

Application (22A92) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Application (22A91) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2022)

Parties

Coinbase, Inc., Petitioner, represented by Neal Kumar Katyal

Abraham Bielski, Respondent, represented by Hassan Ali Zavareei

David Suski, et al., Respondent, represented by David John Harris Jr.

Amici Curiae

Atlantic Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Lawrence S. Ebner

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark Andrew Perry

Civil Justice Association of California, Amicus Curiae, represented by Fred J. Hiestand

DRI Center for Law and Public Policy, Amicus Curiae, represented by Sarah Elizabeth Spencer

National Retail Federation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew John Pincus

Retail Litigation Center, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Jason D. Russell

Washington Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Cory L. Andrews

 
Last updated: February 23, 2024