Denied

No. 22-1116

Klamath Irrigation District v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.

Reply of petitioner Klamath Irrigation District filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents The Klamath Tribes and the Hoopa Valley Tribe in opposition filed.

Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 27, 2023, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2023 to September 27, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 20, 2023, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 21, 2023 to September 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 21, 2023, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 14, 2023 to August 21, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Letter pursuant to Rule 12.6 from counsel for respondents Shasta View Irrigation District, et al. filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 14, 2023, for all respondents.

Motion of respondent Hoopa Valley Tribe to extend the time to file a response from June 14, 2023 to July 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2023)

Application (22A862) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 11, 2023.

Application (22A862) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 11, 2023 to May 11, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

Klamath Irrigation District, Petitioner, represented by Frederick Richard Yarger

The Klamath Tribes and the Hoopa Valley Tribe, Respondent, represented by Shay Dvoretzky

United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al., Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Amici Curiae

Hoopa Valley Tribe, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thane Dennis Somerville

Shasta View Irrigation District, Tulelake Irrigation District, Klamath Water Users Association, Rob Unruh, and Ben DuVal, Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul Scott Simmons

Shasta View Irrigation District, Tulelake Irrigation District, Klamath Water Users Association, Rob Unruh, and Ben DuVal, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brittany Kirsten Johnson

The Klamath Tribes, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeremiah Daniel Weiner

 
Last updated: May 21, 2024