Denied

No. 22-1135

Center for Medical Progress, et al. v. National Abortion Federation

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.

Reply of petitioners Center for Medical Progress, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent National Abortion Federation in opposition filed.

Brief amici curiae of American Constiutional Rights Union, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Missouri, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Ethics and Public Policy Center filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 7, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 6, 2023 to August 7, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due July 6, 2023)

Letter of May 31, 2023 from counsel for petitioners received. Distributed

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.

Waiver of right of respondent National Abortion Federation to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2023)

Application (22A789) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 18, 2023.

Application (22A789) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 19, 2023 to May 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

Center for Medical Progress; BioMax Procurement Services, LLC; and David Daleiden, Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey Matthew Harris

National Abortion Federation, Respondent, represented by James Reid Sigel

Amici Curiae

American Constiutional Rights Union; Alabama Center for Law & Liberty, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Joseph Park Jr.

Ethics and Public Policy Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel Nolan Nightingale

Judicial Watch, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Meredith Leigh Di Liberto

State of Missouri, Amicus Curiae, represented by Maria Ann Lanahan

 
Last updated: May 18, 2024