Decided

No. 22-331

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General v. Fernando Cordero-Garcia, aka Fernando Cordero

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Judgment issued.

Judgment AFFIRMED (as to No. 22-23); Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED (as to No. 22-331). Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Barrett,, and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined, and in which Kagan, J., joined as to all but Part III. VIDED.

Argued. For Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General: Curtis E. Gannon, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Jean Francois Pugin: Martha Hutton, Washington, D. C. For Fernando Cordero-Garcia: Mark C. Fleming, Boston, Mass. VIDED.

Records from the Board of Immigration Appeals were transmitted electronically.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.

Reply of petitioner Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Fernando Cordero-Garcia in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 7, 2022 to December 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)

Parties

Merrick B. Garland, Petitioner, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Cordero-Garcia, Fernando, Respondent, represented by Mark Christopher Fleming

 
Last updated: February 29, 2024