Denied

No. 22-338

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

Reply of petitioners R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 20, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2022 to January 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due December 22, 2022)

Brief amicus curiae of Vapor Technology Association filed. (Distributed)

Amicus brief of Vapor Technology Association not accepted for filing. (November 17, 2022 - Corrected brief to be submitted)

Waiver of right of respondent Cty. of Los Angeles, et al. to respond filed.

Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Cty. of Los Angeles, et al.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al.

Letter of October 7, 2022 pursuant to Rule 35.3 from petitioners received.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)

Application (22A33) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 7, 2022.

Application (22A33) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 9, 2022 to October 7, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., Petitioner, represented by Noel John Francisco

Cty. of Los Angeles, et al., Respondent, represented by Kent Randall Raygor

Amici Curiae

E-Cigarette Businesses and Trade Associations, Amicus Curiae, represented by Eric Philip Gotting

Vapor Technology Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anthony Lawrence Abboud

 
Last updated: December 21, 2024