Argued

No. 22-340

Mark E. Pulsifer v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

See other cases from the Eighth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel GRANTED. J. Robert Black, of Omaha, Nebraska, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.

Argued. For petitioner: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Frederick Liu, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioner Mark E. Pulsifer filed. (Distributed)

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.

CIRCULATED

Brief of respondent United States filed.

Complete record on appeal received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1 envelope). There are sealed documents with this record.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel filed.

Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, October 2, 2023.

Brief amici curiae of FAMM, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Professors Thomas R. Lee, et al. in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.

Brief of petitioner Mark E. Pulsifer filed.

Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 19, 2023. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 24, 2023.

Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.

Brief for the United States filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 13, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2022 to January 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2022.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2022 to December 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)

Parties

Mark E. Pulsifer, Petitioner, represented by Shay Dvoretzky

United States, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Amici Curiae

Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael David Pepson

FAMM, American Civil Liberties Union, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by David John Debold

National Association of Federal Defenders, Amicus Curiae, represented by Vincent J. Brunkow

Professors Thomas R. Lee, Kevin Tobia, and Jesse Egbert, Amicus Curiae, represented by Philip Daniel Williamson

 
Last updated: April 25, 2024