from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
See other cases from the District of Columbia Circuit.
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. The December 16, 2022 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denying petitioners’ motion to intervene is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the motion as moot. Justice Jackson dissents from the vacatur of the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and would instead dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. Statement of Justice Gorsuch. (Detached Opinion)
Letter of petitioners Arizona, et al. in response filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, and The Presidential Coalition filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.
Brief of petitioners Arizona, et al. filed.
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
The record for the U.S.C.A.-D.C. Circuit is available on PACER.
The record for the U.S.D.C.-D.C. is available on PACER.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 1, 2023.
Record requested from U.S.C.A.-D.C. Circuit.
The joint appendix and petitioners’ brief on the merits are to be filed on or before Wednesday, January 18, 2023. Respondents’ briefs on the merits are to be filed on or before Tuesday, February 7, 2023. The reply brief is to be filed on or before Friday, February 17, 2023. Amicus curiae briefs in support of petitioners or in support of neither party are to be filed on or before Friday, January 20, 2023. Amicus curiae briefs in support of respondents are to be filed on or before Thursday, February 9, 2023.
Application (22A544) for stay pending certiorari presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted. The November 15, 2022 order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 1:21– cv–00100, is hereby stayed. Applicants suggested this Court treat the application as a petition for a writ of certiorari; doing so, the petition is granted. The parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether the State applicants may intervene to challenge the District Court’s summary judgment order. This stay precludes giving effect to the District Court order setting aside and vacating the Title 42 policy; the stay itself does not prevent the federal government from taking any action with respect to that policy. The Court’s review on certiorari is limited to the question of intervention. While the underlying merits of the District Court’s summary judgment order are pertinent to that analysis, the Court does not grant review of those merits, which hav...
Application (22A544) referred to the Court.
Reply of applicant Arizona, et al. filed.
Motion for leave to file and brief of amicus curiae filed by Immigration Reform Law Institute.
Response to application from respondent Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, et al., filed.
Federal Respondents' Opposition to the Application For A Stay Pending Certiorari filed.
Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is ordered that the November 15, 2022 order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 1:21-cv-00100, is hereby stayed pending further order of The Chief Justice or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Tuesday, December 20, 2022, by 5 p.m. (EST).
Application (22A544) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Arizona, et al., Petitioner, represented by Drew Curtis Ensign
Arizona, et al., Petitioner, represented by Elizabeth B. Murrill
Mayorkas, Alejandro, et al., Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, et al., Respondent, represented by Lee Gelernt
Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, and The Presidential Coalition, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gary Michael Lawkowski
Immigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher J. Hajec
The Protect Democracy Project, Amicus Curiae, represented by Justin Grant Florence