Denied

No. 22-6050

Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.

Waiver of right of respondents Zantavia Bogan, Kendall Brookings, Cardinal Group Management to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondents Louisiana Department of Justice, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, Ronald Beaver, Patrick Magee, Judge William Morvant, Judge Lisa Woodruff-White, Judge Wilson Fields, and Renetta Antee-Griffin to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondents The City of Baton Rouge; Baton Rouge Police Department, et al. to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Japan Tobacco International U.S.A., Inc. to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Brad Cranmer to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Liggett Vector Brands LLC to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2022)

Parties

Jane Doe, Petitioner, pro se

Brad Cranmer, Respondent, represented by Janet M. Schroer

Japan Tobacco International U.S.A., Inc., Respondent, represented by Chance Lyman

Liggett Vector Brands LLC, Respondent, represented by Kelly Anne Luther

Louisiana Department of Justice, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, Ronald Beaver, Patrick Magee, Judge William Morvant, Judge Lisa Woodruff-White, Judge Wilson Fields, and Renetta Antee-Griffin, Respondent, represented by Jacqueline B. Wilson

The City of Baton Rouge; Baton Rouge Police Department, et al., Respondent, represented by J. Aaron Landau

United States, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

Zantavia Bogan, Kendall Brookings, Cardinal Group Management, Respondent, represented by Kelsey L. Shewbert

 
Last updated: November 4, 2024