Argued

No. 22-674

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

See other cases from the Fifth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Argued. For Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General: Charles L. McCloud, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For petitioner in 22-674 and respondents in 22-884: Easha Anand, Stanford, Cal. VIDED.

Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available with the Clerk.

CIRCULATED

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, January 8, 2024. VIDED.

Reply of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed. VIDED.

Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Motion for divided argument filed by petitioner in No. 22-674 and respondents in No. 22-884 DENIED. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of National Immigration Litigation Alliance, et al. filed (11/1/23). VIDED.

Motion for divided argument filed by petitioner in No. 22-674 and respondents in No. 22-884. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Lucas Champollion, Brandon Waldon, Masoud Jasbi, Willow Parks, and Cleo Condoravdi filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Forty-Two Former Immigration Judges and Members of The Board of Immigration Appeals filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of National Immigrant Justice Center, et al. filed. VIDED.

Brief of respondent Varinder Singh filed (as to 22-884).

Brief of respondent Raul Daniel Mendez-Colin filed. (as to 22-884)

Brief of petitioner Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves filed (as to 22-674).

Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed. VIDED.

Brief of Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed. VIDED.

Joint appendix filed. VIDED.

The briefing proposal set forth in the Solicitor General’s letter of July 27, 2023, is adopted. The Solicitor General shall file a consolidated opening brief on the merits, limited to 17,000 words, on or before August 29, 2023. Any brief of an amicus curiae in support, or in support of neither party, shall bear a light green cover. Petitioner in No. 22-674 and respondents in No. 22-884 may each file a response brief on the merits on or before October 18, 2023, and the briefs shall bear light red covers. Any brief of an amicus curiae in support shall bear a dark green cover. The Solicitor General shall file a consolidated reply brief limited to 9,000 words. VIDED

Letter proposing a briefing schedule filed by the Solicitor General on behalf of the parties filed. VIDED.

As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.

Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 22-674. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 22-674. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”

Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 22-884 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.

Reply of petitioner Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 24, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 21, 2023 to March 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)

Parties

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves, Petitioner, represented by Amanda Lea Waterhouse

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves, Petitioner, represented by Elizabeth Graber Bentley

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves, Petitioner, represented by Nadia Anguiano

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves, Petitioner, represented by Ross Alan Miller

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves, Petitioner, represented by Raed Gonzalez

Raul Daniel Mendez-Colin, Respondent, represented by Christopher John Stender

Varinder Singh, Respondent, represented by Saad Ahmad

Amici Curiae

Forty-Two Former Immigration Judges and Members of The Board of Immigration Appeals, Amicus Curiae, represented by Richard W. Mark

Immigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher J. Hajec

Lucas Champollion, Brandon Waldon, Masoud Jasbi, Willow Parks, and Cleo Condoravdi, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael Daniel Reif

National Immigrant Justice Center, American Immigration Lawyers Association, American Immigration Council, Amicus Curiae, represented by Matthew Eben Price

National Immigration Litigation Alliance et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas Gregory Sprankling

 
Last updated: May 17, 2024