Denied

No. 22-739

David Kagan, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.

Lodging proposal letter under Rule 32.3 of respondent filed.

Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief amici curiae of Community Housing Improvement Program and Rent Stabilization Association of N.Y.C., Inc. in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. filed.

Rule 32.3 letter from amici curiae San Francisco Apartment Association, et al. proposing to lodge non-record material filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2023 to May 3, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due April 3, 2023)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.

Waiver of right of respondent City of Los Angeles, et al. to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2023)

Parties

David Kagan, et al., Petitioner, represented by J. David Breemer

City of Los Angeles, et al., Respondent, represented by Jonathan H. Eisenman

Amici Curiae

Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Douglas J. Dennington

Community Housing Improvement Program and Rent Stabilization Association of N.Y.C., Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew John Pincus

San Francisco Apartment Association et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew M. Zacks

San Francisco Apartment Association et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Emily Lowther Brough

 
Last updated: October 9, 2024