from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
Reply of petitioners Charles Moore, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Tax Reform filed.
Brief amici curiae of The Pacific Research Institute, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed.
Brief amici curiae of The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Landmark Legal Foundation filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 26, 2023.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2023 to April 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
Charles Moore, et al., Petitioner, represented by Andrew Michael Grossman
United States, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Americans for Tax Reform, Amicus Curiae, represented by Steven Andrew Engel
Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Clark M. Neily III
Landmark Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Matthew Conrad Forys
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas Ryan McCarthy
The Buckeye Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Larry James Obhof Jr.
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gordon Dwyer Todd
The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research and Professors Erik M. Jensen and James W. Ely, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael B. Kimberly
The Pacific Research Institute and Professor Hank Adler, Amicus Curiae, represented by Erik S. Jaffe