Argued

No. 22-899

Jason Smith v. Arizona

from the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One

See other cases from Arizona.

Docket Entries

Argued. For petitioner: Hari Santhanam, Chicago, Ill. For United States, as amicus curiae: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Alexander W. Samuels, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Phoenix, Ariz.

Reply of petitioner Jason Smith filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of National District Attorneys Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of American Board of Forensic Toxicology, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Colorado, et al. filed. (Distributed). (Corrected paper form of brief received and distributed--December 28, 2023--original electronic submission contains correction.)

Brief of respondent Arizona filed. (Distributed)

Respondent's request to lodge non-record material pursuant to Rule 32.3 filed.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Record received from the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One (one envelope). The remainder of the record is electronic and is available with the Clerk.

CIRCULATED

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Record requested from the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One.

Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Richard D. Friedman filed.

Brief amici curiae of The Innocence Network, Forensic Justice Project, et al.. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Alameda County Public Defender, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National College for DUI Defense, Inc. filed.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, January 10, 2024.

Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)

Brief of petitioner Jason Smith filed.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.

Reply of petitioner Jason Smith filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Arizona in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 26, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 25, 2023 to June 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)

Parties

Jason Smith, Petitioner, represented by Hari Santhanam

Arizona, Respondent, represented by Alexander Westbrook Samuels

Amici Curiae

Alameda County Public Defender and California Public Defenders Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joshi Ashoma Valentine

American Board of Forensic Toxicology, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Kendra Nychel Beckwith

Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kent S. Scheidegger

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, American Civil Liberties Union, and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Arizona, Amicus Curiae, represented by Timothy Patrick O'Toole

National College for DUI Defense, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Michelle Lynn Behan

National District Attorneys Association et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Albert Calvin Locher

Oklahoma, Colorado, 36 Additional States, 1 Territory, and 1 Federal District, Amicus Curiae, represented by Garry Michael Gaskins II

Richard D. Friedman, Amicus Curiae, represented by Richard D. Friedman

THE INNOCENCE NETWORK, FORENSIC JUSTICE PROJECT, AND THE CENTER FOR INTEGRITY IN FORENSIC SCIENCES, INC., Amicus Curiae, represented by Anna K. Sortun

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar

 
Last updated: May 21, 2024