Denied

No. 23-504

Photoplaza, Inc., et al. v. Herbal Brands, Inc.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.

Reply of petitioners Photoplaza, Inc., et al. filed.

Brief of respondent Herbal Brands, Inc. in opposition filed.

Brief amicus curiae of DRI Center for Law and Public Policy filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 14, 2023)

Parties

Photoplaza, Inc., Goldshop 300, Inc., Goldshop, Inc., Instock Goodies, Inc. Tzvi Heschel, Shloma Bichler and Lali Dats, Petitioner, represented by Serge Krimnus

Herbal Brands, Inc., Respondent, represented by John J. Kulewicz

Amici Curiae

Atlantic Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Lawrence S. Ebner

DRI Center for Law and Public Policy, Amicus Curiae, represented by Melinda S. Kollross

 
Last updated: March 1, 2024