Denied

No. 23-71

City of Costa Mesa, California v. SoCal Recovery, LLC, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.

Reply of petitioner City of Costa Mesa, California filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents SoCal Recovery, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 18, 2023.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 27, 2023 to October 18, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due September 27, 2023)

Brief amici curiae of City of Mission Viejo, et. al. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.

Waiver of right of respondent SoCal Recovery, LLC, and RAW Recovery, LLC to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 24, 2023)

Application (22A971) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 21, 2023.

Application (22A971) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 24, 2023 to July 21, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

City of Costa Mesa, Petitioner, represented by Mary-Christine Sungaila

SoCal Recovery, LLC, and RAW Recovery, LLC, Respondent, represented by Elizabeth N. Brancart

Amici Curiae

City of Mission Viejo, et. al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Norman Arthur Dupont

 
Last updated: May 21, 2024